Chess may possibly be a learning tool to understand why a person respond to certain situations with peculiar behavioral characteristics when an opportunity is available or arises.
Typically anthropological societies have their settings in two types of archaeological communities; the farming communities and the hunting communities.
The inferential context to the subject matter concerning chess which is open for discussion or debate is that there essential are two types of chess players at each extreme of the kaleidoscopic spectrum.
The first type or class of chess players are those who employ tactical strategic planning ( the farming/gathering/harvesting class) delays for longer terms or prolonged logistics for checkmating an opponent’s King(s).
The second type or class of chess players are those chess enthusiasts who position his/her pieces for an instant win ( the hunting class ) resulting in a quick checkmate defeat of an opponents’ Kings(s).
The effects of the two types of playing techniques raises the awareness of the strategic notion of chess players who either play with compassion or with a passion.
Chess players who play with compassion may be those enthusiasts who share the view that winning the game(s) are not the only means to an end but rather viewed as a contextual premonition of enhancing the involvement in the qualitative as well as the qualitative richness of the evolution of intrinsic strategic dexterity and or tactical engagements.
On the contrary the other supposition of play involves chess players who play with a passion ( the premonition that winning is the only means to an end while negating other aspects of strategic domination of the game through qualitative and or quantitative data spectral diagnostic and prognostic analysis.
The usage of the data quality without precedence to either winning or losing a match is much more an effective suggestive topic which is open for discussion or data gathering.
Such a topic may provide a descriptive narrative of the underlying causes of human behavioral characteristics pertaining to the possible application and implementation of chess players’ logic strategic potentialities and capabilities with regards to and in accordance with the understanding of the set of Rules of Engagements or Detante BEFORE a match commence.
Targeted Age Group: Chess players ages : 10 – 90 years old